Overview
- NX (π²): A powerful tool for managing monorepos with integrated build and task running.
- Turborepo (π): Optimized for fast builds and caching in large-scale frontend and backend projects.
- Lerna (π¦): A simpler tool for managing multiple JavaScript packages in a monorepo.
Summary
- NX (π²): A powerful monorepo management tool with extensive features for frontend and backend development.
- Turborepo (π): Focuses on build performance, caching, and task parallelization in large-scale projects.
- Lerna (π¦): Simpler tool for managing packages in a monorepo with automatic versioning and publishing.
NX vs Turborepo
-
NX is more focused on managing a
monorepofor multiple applications and libraries, with a strong emphasis on scalability and modularity. It's an excellent choice for building a micro-frontend architecture. -
Turborepo is also a
monorepotool, but it is more focused on build caching and task running across the repository. It is lightweight and can be used with different frontend frameworks, but NX has more built-in features specifically for micro-frontend development, such as code generation, dependency graph, and modular architecture.
Recommendation
-
If youβre working on a large frontend application with micro-frontends, and you want robust tools for managing apps, libraries, and shared code in a monorepo,
NXis a great choice. -
Turborepo can be a good option if your focus is on optimizing build and task running performance, but NX will provide you with more out-of-the-box support for structuring your frontend architecture.
In Summary
-
NX is the tool you should consider if you're looking to build and manage micro-frontends in a
monoreposetup. -
Turborepo is a great alternative if you need build optimization but prefer a simpler setup without as many pre-configured features for micro-frontends.